The input
Your approved systems, requests, documents, and priority rules. A named contact resolves missing information.
Support your attorneys with organized matter files, document preparation, chronology work, and administrative follow-through shaped around the firm’s supervision and confidentiality standards. Find the responsibilities, working outputs, and review points for each role below.
Book a free consultationBrowse all services ↓
Explore a focused workflow or combine related tasks into one clearly defined support role. Every service includes practical responsibilities and a useful handoff.

Prepare administrative intake records for the firm’s conflict and acceptance procedures.
Explore this service
Create a usable document structure around the firm’s matter identifiers and review habits.
Explore this service
Arrange source-supported events into a reviewable chronology for the supervising attorney.
Explore this service
Keep administrative questions and attorney-approved updates connected to the matter.
Explore this service
Prepare consistent drafts and review packs using your firm’s templates and instructions.
Explore this service
Organize assigned discovery materials within the review instructions and access controls your firm sets.
Explore this service
Collect and organize assigned source materials for attorney analysis and verification.
Explore this service
Support attorney-controlled calendars and the preparation of filing logistics.
Explore this serviceA matter can produce more correspondence and documents than any one person can comfortably keep in view. The value of support is not simply moving files—it is making the next review easier without taking legal judgment away from the attorney.
Your approved systems, requests, documents, and priority rules. A named contact resolves missing information.
Current status, responsible owner, last action, and outstanding questions. Each entry links back to its source.
Completed tasks and exceptions, separated clearly. Your reviewer sees what is ready and what still needs a decision.
A useful service starts with a real queue. Use these examples to choose the responsibility you want covered and the result your reviewer should receive. Related responsibilities can be combined after checking volume, coverage, and access.
Prepare administrative intake records for the firm’s conflict and acceptance procedures.
Intake summary; Party information list; Consultation preparation pack.
Check names, source details, recipient permissions, and whether an inquiry is clearly distinguished from an accepted engagement.
Create a usable document structure around the firm’s matter identifiers and review habits.
Matter document index; Missing-file register; Organized review folder.
Review matter matching, version labels, access controls, and whether an index points to the intended document.
Arrange source-supported events into a reviewable chronology for the supervising attorney.
Source-linked chronology; Date discrepancy list; Attorney review notes.
Check every entry against its source and distinguish document dates, reported event dates, and inferred dates.
Keep administrative questions and attorney-approved updates connected to the matter.
Client contact history; Document request queue; Attorney callback list.
Check recipient authority, matter identity, message version, and whether a commitment has been approved.
Prepare consistent drafts and review packs using your firm’s templates and instructions.
Formatted draft; Attachment checklist; Document assembly pack.
Check references, pagination, names, attachment order, and whether unapproved text has been introduced.
Organize assigned discovery materials within the review instructions and access controls your firm sets.
Production index; Document tracking register; Review administration notes.
Check completeness of the index, file integrity, matter access, and whether attorney review decisions are accurately reflected.
Collect and organize assigned source materials for attorney analysis and verification.
Research source pack; Citation list; Question and limitation notes.
Verify source identity and quotations; preserve research dates and flag authorities requiring current-status review.
Support attorney-controlled calendars and the preparation of filing logistics.
Attorney-reviewed calendar; Filing preparation checklist; Acknowledgment register.
Confirm source documents, time zones, court identifiers, and the difference between prepared, submitted, and accepted filings.
A matter can produce more correspondence and documents than any one person can comfortably keep in view. The value of support is not simply moving files—it is making the next review easier without taking legal judgment away from the attorney.
Choose recent examples from your normal workload, including one incomplete request and one that needed a decision. Note how often each task arrives, how long it usually takes, and whether the work clusters around particular days or deadlines.
Provide intake forms, confidentiality procedures, conflict-check workflow, and the attorney who decides whether to accept a matter.
Agree what the assistant can complete using a documented rule and what must come back to your team. A clear escalation route helps avoid repeated interruptions while keeping unusual requests visible.
Conflict clearance, legal advice, engagement acceptance, and assessment of rights or deadlines remain with attorneys.
Document working hours, time zones, priority categories, and who covers the queue outside the agreed schedule. Distinguish an acknowledgment from a completed task so a quick reply is never mistaken for a finished request.
For legal team, the plan should also name who can change priorities when a time-sensitive item arrives.
Begin with a manageable portion of the queue. Your reviewer checks completed work against source records and gives specific feedback. Expand responsibilities only when the examples show the process is understood and the access and training requirements are in place.
Bring your current tools to the consultation: Clio where authorized, MyCase where authorized, Secure intake portal, Firm calendar, iManage where authorized, NetDocuments where authorized. Final requirements are confirmed together.
Agree a reporting format before the role begins. The aim is to make the queue easier to manage, not to create another report your team has to decipher.
Review new requests, approaching deadlines, and items returned for correction. Check the latest instructions and identify anything missing before taking the next action.
Update the approved record as work changes. Keep source references and the next owner together. Escalations should include the question, the evidence already checked, and the decision needed.
Separate completed items from work awaiting information or approval. Include the next action and responsible person for each open item so the next shift or reviewer can continue without reconstructing the history.
Not necessarily. Related tasks can form one role when the workload, hours, systems, and experience requirements fit together. We’ll discuss the practical combination during your consultation.
Begin with a documented scope and review actual workload. Additional responsibilities should be agreed with clear training, access, and review requirements.
Pick work that repeats, has a clear owner, and can be checked against an example. Bring the volume, deadlines, and common exceptions to the conversation.
Your authorized staff keep professional judgment, policy decisions, financial authority, and final approvals. Each service page describes the relevant boundaries.
Tell us where the queue slows down. We’ll discuss the scope, tools, coverage, and review points that belong in your support role.
Define the role before making a commitment.