Research
Source-led explanations of the workforce, records, and operating processes that shape your industry.
Are client intake summaries separating facts from impressions?
An operational research protocol for intake fact separation, with a fixed population, an evidence rule, and a dated review.
Read the article ↗
Do matter files show the source for each calendared deadline?
An operational research protocol for deadline source traceability, with a fixed population, an evidence rule, and a dated review.
Read the article ↗
Do nonlawyer task records show attorney review points?
An operational research protocol for review point visibility, with a fixed population, an evidence rule, and a dated review.
Read the article ↗
Do privilege flags record who applied them and why?
An operational research protocol for privilege flag evidence, with a fixed population, an evidence rule, and a dated review.
Read the article ↗
How current is the hearing binder against the file index?
An operational research protocol for binder index currency, with a fixed population, an evidence rule, and a dated review.
Read the article ↗
How often do exhibit indexes match the marked exhibits?
An operational research protocol for exhibit index accuracy, with a fixed population, an evidence rule, and a dated review.
Read the article ↗
What share of discovery response logs name the responding party?
An operational research protocol for discovery party attribution, with a fixed population, an evidence rule, and a dated review.
Read the article ↗
Supervision should be visible in the legal support workflow
An operational research brief on nonlawyer support, instruction, review ownership, and source traceability.
Read the article ↗Start with the work
you want to hand over.
Tell us where the queue slows down. We’ll discuss the scope, tools, coverage, and review points that belong in your support role.
Define the role before making a commitment.